Executive summary

Central Asia has been improving trade facilitation

The governments of Central Asia have made significant progress in trade facilitation, as evidenced by improvements in their performance on the OECD Trade Facilitation Indicators (TFI) in 2022. Uzbekistan achieved the largest relative performance improvement since 2019, while Kazakhstan led in absolute TFI score increase and is the best regional TFI performer. Governments in Central Asia have improved the guidelines and procedures for public consultation processes with a focus on engaging the trade community in policy design. They have expanded the early release of draft rules for public feedback, transparent notice-and-comment frameworks, and efforts to involve a wider range of stakeholders, enhancing inclusivity and transparency. Governments have established National Committees for Trade Facilitation, which together with well-functioning mechanisms for consultations with traders, are contributing to enhancing public-private co-operation for trade facilitation. The increased availability of information in real-time among domestic agencies enhances day-to-day co-operation between border agencies.

Nevertheless, challenges persist due to limited dissemination of information, deficient digitalisation and automation, and poor agency co-operation. Governments have improved information provision, but further efforts are needed, particularly in harmonising and making trade-related regulations readily available. There is room for improvement in providing comprehensive and user-friendly information on penalty provisions, appeal procedures, judicial decisions, and trade agreements. This includes making trade-related legislation available online, with particular emphasis on harmonising the advance publication of regulations before they come into force, a gap observed in Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan face challenges in digitalising and automating trade procedures. While progress has been made across the region, there remains a need to enhance electronic data interchange, pre-arrival processing, and the implementation of national online trade Single Windows. Finally, Central Asia faces lasting deficiencies in domestic and international border agency co-operation. Efforts are being made to improve co-ordination, but further steps are needed to enhance collaboration among agencies and streamline border processes.

Countries should further include the trade community in policymaking, harmonise regional standards, and intensify agency co-operation. Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan should prioritise consulting the private sector and disseminating trade facilitation tools and information. This includes advance rulings, user-friendly customs websites, and transparency in trade-related regulations. The Central Asian economies should also work on reducing the duplication of paper and electronic clearance procedures through enhanced digitalisation efforts, such as aligning customs documents, implementing electronic payment systems, and harmonising e-customs systems. Crucially, to improve regional co-ordination and collaboration, governments should empower customs agents for selected border agency controls, establish steering committees, and develop domestic mechanisms to support inter-agency co-ordination. This partnership should extent to regular meetings with the private sector and regional co-operation should also be encouraged, including through exchange of staff and training programmes to promote interoperability among border agencies.

╳

Disclaimers

This work is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Member countries of the OECD.

This document, as well as any data and map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area.

The statistical data for Israel are supplied by and under the responsibility of the relevant Israeli authorities. The use of such data by the OECD is without prejudice to the status of the Golan Heights, East Jerusalem and Israeli settlements in the West Bank under the terms of international law.

Note by the Republic of Türkiye
The information in this document with reference to “Cyprus” relates to the southern part of the Island. There is no single authority representing both Turkish and Greek Cypriot people on the Island. Türkiye recognises the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC). Until a lasting and equitable solution is found within the context of the United Nations, Türkiye shall preserve its position concerning the “Cyprus issue”.

Note by all the European Union Member States of the OECD and the European Union
The Republic of Cyprus is recognised by all members of the United Nations with the exception of Türkiye. The information in this document relates to the area under the effective control of the Government of the Republic of Cyprus.

Corrigenda to OECD publications may be found on line at: www.oecd.org/about/publishing/corrigenda.htm.

The use of this work, whether digital or print, is governed by the Terms and Conditions to be found at https://www.oecd.org/termsandconditions.