1887

Sustainable Results in Development

Using the SDGs for Shared Results and Impact

image of Sustainable Results in Development

Governments and providers of development co-operation increasingly use Sustainable Development Goal indicators to guide their policies and practices. The close examination of three large recipients of development co-operation: Ethiopia, Kenya and Myanmar across the sectors of Education, Sanitation and Energy reveals four inter-related challenges in using SDG indicators at country level. First, the cost of using specific SDG indicators varies in relation to indicator complexity – complementary investments in country statistical systems may be necessary. Second, providers synchronising their country-level results planning with partner countries find it easier to align to and measure SDG indicators together with the partner country and other providers. Third, reliance on joint monitoring approaches is helping providers reduce the cost of SDG monitoring. Finally, while disaggregating SDG data by gender and by urban-rural dimensions is common, other data disaggregation relevant to ensure that no one is left behind are rare.

English

Background and methodology for the project

Since 2015, the OECD-DAC Results Community has explored ways to build a more co-ordinated approach to results‑based management which supports harmonisation of indicators and promotes ownership by partner countries. Analysis has focused on how a shared commitment to achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) can translate into increased use of the goals, targets and indicators as a common results framework for both providers of development co-operation and partner countries. This work led to a policy paper and a guidance note (Engberg-Pedersen, 2018[1]; OECD, 2018[2]) that present a menu of SDG targets and indicators that can strengthen providers’ results frameworks, facilitate data collection and use, and offer improved platforms for dialogue with partner countries. A menu of 42 targets was developed, based on those which were: Tier I; relevant to development co‑operation; and based on outcomes. See: https://doi.org/10.1787/24140929.

English

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error