OECD Economics Department Working Papers
Working papers from the Economics Department of the OECD that cover the full range of the Department’s work including the economic situation, policy analysis and projections; fiscal policy, public expenditure and taxation; and structural issues including ageing, growth and productivity, migration, environment, human capital, housing, trade and investment, labour markets, regulatory reform, competition, health, and other issues.
The views expressed in these papers are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the OECD or of the governments of its member countries.
- ISSN : 18151973 (en ligne)
- https://doi.org/10.1787/18151973
Primary and Secondary Education in the United States
The average educational attainment of US students is weak by international comparison. For example,
mean results of PISA test scores are below the OECD average. This is despite substantial resources
devoted to the schooling system. One partial explanation for this is that academic standards, curriculum
and examinations are not sufficiently challenging in most US states. In 2001, Congress enacted the No
Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) to raise achievement levels, especially of certain groups that perform
badly. The Act requires states to establish clear content standards as to what students should know, to
regularly assess performance and to set thresholds for adequate yearly progress; it also requires schools
where students are failing to meet such thresholds to improve or close, while enhancing options for parents
of children in such schools to place their children elsewhere. The law appears to be well conceived,
addressing key problems in a sensible manner. Preliminary indications are consistent with it raising school
performance and closing achievement gaps. The NCLB legislation should therefore be reauthorised.
Moreover, the NCLB framework of standards, assessment and accountability should be extended through
upper secondary education. That said, there are a number of areas in which improvements could be made.
Though the federal government cannot set standards, it could strengthen incentives for more states to make
their standards more challenging. As well, the federal government should help states and districts to better
test student achievement and assess progress.
Mots-clés: human capital, primary education, United States, education, secondary education
JEL:
I22: Health, Education, and Welfare / Education and Research Institutions / Educational Finance; Financial Aid;
H52: Public Economics / National Government Expenditures and Related Policies / Government Expenditures and Education
- Cliquez pour accéder
-
Cliquer pour télécharger le fichier PDF - 735.91KBPDF