To facilitate the policy dialogue in Argentina, the tables below provide an overview on the 198 actions proposed in each chapter of the Integrity Review. Together with clarifying the responsible unit(s), the tables also give a hint on whether the actions could be implemented in the short or medium term, or whether the action require a long term perspective. Clearly, for actions that would require legislative changes, for instance, a clear-cut responsibility cannot be attributed to a single unit and the outcome is uncertain. However, taking the OECD recommendation provided as a starting point, the government could commit nonetheless to advance discussions on how to move forward or even propose a draft regulation. Whenever possible, the table indicate which government entity could move forward such a proposal. Ideally, however, such discussions and proposals for legislative changes would be issues by the recommended Commission for Integrity and Transparency.