| Mark | Date Date | Title Title | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 Oct 2021 |
Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Indonesia (Stage 2)
This report reflects the outcome of the stage 2 peer monitoring of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by Indonesia. |
||||
| 28 Nov 2019 |
Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Indonesia (Stage 1)
This report reflects the outcome of the stage 1 peer review of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by Indonesia. |
||||
| 26 Jul 2021 |
Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, India (Stage 2)
This report reflects the outcome of the stage 2 peer monitoring of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by India. |
||||
| 24 Oct 2019 |
Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, India (Stage 1)
This report reflects the outcome of the stage 1 peer review of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by India. |
||||
| 25 May 2021 |
Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Iceland (Stage 2)
This report reflects the outcome of the stage 2 peer monitoring of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by Iceland. |
||||
| 25 May 2021 |
Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Hungary (Stage 2)
This report reflects the outcome of the stage 2 peer monitoring of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by Hungary. |
||||
| 18 Oct 2021 |
Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Hong Kong, China (Stage 2)
This report reflects the outcome of the stage 2 peer monitoring of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by Hong Kong, China. |
||||
| 28 Nov 2019 |
Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Hong Kong, China (Stage 1)
This report reflects the outcome of the stage 1 peer review of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by Hong Kong, China. |
||||
| 24 Jan 2022 |
Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Guernsey (Stage 2)
This report reflects the outcome of the Stage 2 peer monitoring of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by Guernsey, which is accompanied by a document addressing the implementation of best practices. |
||||
| 24 Feb 2020 |
Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Guernsey (Stage 1)
This report reflects the outcome of the stage 1 peer review of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by Guernsey. |
||||
| 13 Sept 2022 |
Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Greenland (Stage 2)
Under BEPS Action 14, members of the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS have committed to implement a minimum standard to strengthen the effectiveness and efficiency of the mutual agreement procedure (MAP). The MAP is included in Article 25 of the... |
||||
| 16 Feb 2021 |
Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Greenland (Stage 1)
This report reflects the outcome of the Stage 1 peer monitoring of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by Greenland. |
||||
| 25 May 2021 |
Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Greece (Stage 2)
This report reflects the outcome of the stage 2 peer monitoring of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by Greece. |
||||
| 13 Sept 2022 |
Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Gibraltar (Stage 2)
Under BEPS Action 14, members of the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS have committed to implement a minimum standard to strengthen the effectiveness and efficiency of the mutual agreement procedure (MAP). The MAP is included in Article 25 of the... |
||||
| 16 Feb 2021 |
Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Gibraltar (Stage 1)
This report reflects the outcome of the Stage 1 peer monitoring of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by Gibraltar. |
||||
| 09 Apr 2020 |
Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Germany (Stage 2)
This report reflects the outcome of the stage 2 peer monitoring of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by Germany. |
||||
| 15 Dec 2017 |
Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Germany (Stage 1)
This report reflects the outcome of the stage 1 peer review of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by Germany, which is accompanied by a document addressing the implementation of best practices which can be accessed on the OECD website. |
||||
| 09 Apr 2020 |
Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, France (Stage 2)
This report reflects the outcome of the stage 2 peer monitoring of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by France. |
||||
| 15 Dec 2017 |
Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, France (Stage 1)
Under Action 14, jurisdictions have committed to implement a minimum standard to strengthen the effectiveness and efficiency of the mutual agreement procedure (MAP). The MAP is included in Article 25 of the OECD Model Tax Convention and commits... |
||||
| 12 Mar 2018 |
Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Finland (Stage 1)
This report reflects the outcome of the stage 1 peer review of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by Finland. |
OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project
Addressing base erosion and profit shifting is a key priority of governments around the globe. In 2013, OECD and G20 countries, working together on an equal footing, adopted a 15-point Action Plan to address BEPS. Beyond securing revenues by realigning taxation with economic activities and value creation, the OECD/G20 BEPS Project aims to create a single set of consensus-based international tax rules to address BEPS, and hence to protect tax bases while offering increased certainty and predictability to taxpayers. In 2016, the OECD and G20 established an Inclusive Framework on BEPS to allow interested countries and jurisdictions to work with OECD and G20 members to develop standards on BEPS related issues and reviewing and monitoring the implementation of the whole BEPS Package. Over 100 countries and jurisdictions have joined the Inclusive Framework.
- ISSN: 23132612 (online)
- https://doi.org/10.1787/23132612
121 - 140 of 239 results
Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Indonesia (Stage 2)
OECD
18 Oct 2021
This report reflects the outcome of the stage 2 peer monitoring of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by Indonesia.
Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Indonesia (Stage 1)
OECD
28 Nov 2019
This report reflects the outcome of the stage 1 peer review of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by Indonesia.
This report reflects the outcome of the stage 2 peer monitoring of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by India.
This report reflects the outcome of the stage 1 peer review of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by India.
Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Iceland (Stage 2)
OECD
25 May 2021
This report reflects the outcome of the stage 2 peer monitoring of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by Iceland.
Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Hungary (Stage 2)
OECD
25 May 2021
This report reflects the outcome of the stage 2 peer monitoring of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by Hungary.
Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Hong Kong, China (Stage 2)
OECD
18 Oct 2021
This report reflects the outcome of the stage 2 peer monitoring of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by Hong Kong, China.
Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Hong Kong, China (Stage 1)
OECD
28 Nov 2019
This report reflects the outcome of the stage 1 peer review of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by Hong Kong, China.
Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Guernsey (Stage 2)
OECD
24 Jan 2022
This report reflects the outcome of the Stage 2 peer monitoring of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by Guernsey, which is accompanied by a document addressing the implementation of best practices.
Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Guernsey (Stage 1)
OECD
24 Feb 2020
This report reflects the outcome of the stage 1 peer review of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by Guernsey.
Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Greenland (Stage 2)
OECD
13 Sept 2022
Under BEPS Action 14, members of the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS have committed to implement a minimum standard to strengthen the effectiveness and efficiency of the mutual agreement procedure (MAP). The MAP is included in Article 25 of the...
Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Greenland (Stage 1)
OECD
16 Feb 2021
This report reflects the outcome of the Stage 1 peer monitoring of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by Greenland.
Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Greece (Stage 2)
OECD
25 May 2021
This report reflects the outcome of the stage 2 peer monitoring of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by Greece.
Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Gibraltar (Stage 2)
OECD
13 Sept 2022
Under BEPS Action 14, members of the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS have committed to implement a minimum standard to strengthen the effectiveness and efficiency of the mutual agreement procedure (MAP). The MAP is included in Article 25 of the...
Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Gibraltar (Stage 1)
OECD
16 Feb 2021
This report reflects the outcome of the Stage 1 peer monitoring of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by Gibraltar.
Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Germany (Stage 2)
OECD
09 Apr 2020
This report reflects the outcome of the stage 2 peer monitoring of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by Germany.
Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Germany (Stage 1)
OECD
15 Dec 2017
This report reflects the outcome of the stage 1 peer review of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by Germany, which is accompanied by a document addressing the implementation of best practices which can be accessed on the OECD website.
Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, France (Stage 2)
OECD
09 Apr 2020
This report reflects the outcome of the stage 2 peer monitoring of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by France.
Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, France (Stage 1)
OECD
15 Dec 2017
Under Action 14, jurisdictions have committed to implement a minimum standard to strengthen the effectiveness and efficiency of the mutual agreement procedure (MAP). The MAP is included in Article 25 of the OECD Model Tax Convention and commits...
Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Finland (Stage 1)
OECD
12 Mar 2018
This report reflects the outcome of the stage 1 peer review of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by Finland.