Major Transport Infrastructure Projects and Economic Development
![image of Major Transport Infrastructure Projects and Economic Development image of Major Transport Infrastructure Projects and Economic Development](https://assets.oecdcode.org/covers/100/g2g46110.jpg)
This report discusses the state of the art in understanding the economic effects of major transport infrastructure projects. It examines the limits of socio-economic cost-benefit analysis (CBA) and reviews the development of complementary and alternative approaches to assessing the benefits of investment in large, transformative projects. In particular, his report focuses on practical appraisal tools developed for assessment of the Grand Paris super-metro and London’s Crossrail project.
Also available in: French
- Click to access:
-
Click to download PDF - 2.56MBPDF
The Evolution of London's Crossrail Scheme and the Development of the Department for Transport's Economic Appraisal Methods
International Transport Forum
Cost-benefit analysis has been used in the United Kingdom for the appraisal of road schemes over the past fifty years. It was less widely used for rail, where most investment was concerned with renewing the existing network. The Central London Rail Study (1988) used cost-benefit analysis to address the problem of overcrowding on London’s rail network. The Crossrail scheme proposed in the Study was discontinued because of a recession and because of the priority given the developing links to London’s Docklands. Progress on Crossrail was resumed in 2002 at the same time as the Department’s appraisal methods were being revised to incorporate wider economic benefits. The quantification of these additional benefits, the resolution of a source of funding and the role of the Mayor all influenced the Government’s decision that the scheme should be built. Identification of some of the wider benefits poses problems for transport models that are only partially resolved through the use of land-use transport interaction models. Although the use of a Gross Value Added metric provides an alternative way of estimating the economic impacts of a scheme, it does not replace cost-benefit analysis as a decision aid for government ministers.
Also available in: French
- Click to access:
-
Click to download PDF - 460.36KBPDF